Stellenbosch University’s Second Welcoming, held on 22 February, aimed to integrate latecomer students into campus life, providing them with a sense of belonging and community. While the event succeeded in fostering connection and support, it also highlighted significant shortcomings in the University’s approach to inclusivity and student welfare.
Essentially, Second Welcoming was designed to help students who missed the first orientation, feel informed and secure. The event offered a blend of essential information and community-building, ensuring that students could navigate their new environment with confidence. One first-year student reflected, “It was very informative. I think the way they set out the program is very useful, especially for first-year students,” while another shared, “It plays a very big part in you feeling safer
around campus because now at least you know what is happening.”
Despite this positive feedback, the absence of formal University representatives at the event raised serious concerns about the institution’s commitment to the initiative. The Rector, Deresh Ramjugernath, was expected to address students but failed to do so without explanation, leaving the responsibility to student leaders like Simiso Langa, Prim of Prims and Mishka Naidu, chairperson of the Academic Affairs Council. While their speeches were well-received, many students felt the lack of institutional involvement undermined the event’s authenticity. A welcoming event, after all, should reflect the university’s active support for its students.
Moreover, a key feature of Second Welcoming, the Dream Walk, was cancelled due to ongoing protests. This symbolic event, which aimed to represent students’ personal and academic transformation, was replaced by impromptu community-driven programs. While these adaptations ensured that the event continued, the absence of the Dream Walk was disappointing for many. One student expressed their let-down, noting that the event had been eagerly anticipated but was ultimately underwhelming. The University’s official Instagram, however, claimed the Dream Walk was a highlight, which many found contradictory and indicative of a disconnect between the institution’s messaging and prevailing feelings amongst students.
The event also took place amid protests addressing deeper systemic issues at the University, including accommodation shortages and financial aid blockages for NSFAS-funded students. Critics might argue that Second Welcoming, while symbolic in its inclusivity, failed to address these urgent concerns.
While Second Welcoming successfully helped integrate latecomers, it also exposed the University’s failure to prioritize student welfare in a meaningful way. The lack of direct engagement from the administration highlighted the institution’s need for a more proactive approach to supporting its students. As Stellenbosch University continues to evolve, it must ensure that its welcoming efforts go beyond symbolic gestures, addressing both the emotional and practical needs of all students.
By Hannerie Rossouw and Tenisha Taylor
